Municipal Coins of Seleukid Syria

Seleukeia in Pieria

Bronze coins  •  References

Identification Number MSE-AE-03
Authority:	municipal issue of a civic alliance with Antioch on the Orontes under Alexander I
Mint:	Seleukeia in Pieria
Period:	148/7 BC
Denomination:	AE Quadruple Unit
Weight:	14.44 g
Diameter:	24 - 25 mm
Obverse:	Jugate bearded heads right, each wearing tainia1; dotted border
Reverse:	‘ΑΔΕΛΦΩΝ’ right, ‘ΔΗΜΩΝ’ left (“of the Brother Peoples”); Zeus Nikephoros (“carrying victory”) seated to left on throne, holding Nike (who is facing left and holding thunderbolt2) in his right hand and long scepter in left hand; Seleukid date ΕΞΡ (year 165 of the Seleukid Era, i.e. 148/7 BC)3 in exergue; control marks in outer right and left field
Die Position:	0º
References:	BMC 20, p. 152, No. 4 (Plate XVIII, 6); Hunterian Coll. III, p. 141, No. 1; Hoover, HSC, 1394
Notes:	(1)	Bronze coins in the name of “the Brother Peoples” were struck in Seleukeia between 149/8 and 147/6 BC. This coinage probably reflected some form of civic alliance with Antioch on the Orontes.4 Four types of these coins were struck in three denominations: the quadruple unit (two bearded heads/Zeus on throne, BMC 20, p. 152, No. 4), two types of the double unit (two bearded heads/Tyche, BMC 20, p. 152, No. 11; head of Zeus/thunderbolt, BMC 20, pp. 151-2, Nos. 1, 5-8 and 10) and the single unit (head of Apollo/tripod, BMC 20, pp. 151-2, Nos. 2-3 and 9).
	(2)	The obverse probably represents the two Demoi (Peoples) of Seleukeia and Antioch.
	(3)	The same reverse design (Zeus Nikephoros with Nike facing left and holding thunderbolt) appears on Seleukeian quasi-municipal bronze coins issued under Alexander I (Houghton, Lorber and Hoover, SC II, 1799; see coin AX1-AE-01 in this collection).

Identification Number MSE-AE-01
Authority:	municipal issue of a civic alliance with Antioch on the Orontes under Alexander I
Mint:	Seleukeia in Pieria
Period:	148/7 BC
Denomination:	AE Double Unit
Weight:	7.61 g
Diameter:	21 - 22 mm
Obverse:	Laureate head of Zeus right; dotted border
Reverse:	‘ΑΔΕΛΦΩ[Ν]’ above, ‘ΔΗΜΩΝ’ below (“of the Brother Peoples”); winged thunderbolt;2 Seleukid date ΕΞΡ (year 165 of the Seleukid Era, i.e. 148/7 BC)3 in left upper field; control marks in right upper field and in exergue; wreath border
Die Position:	90º
References:	BMC 20, p. 152, Nos. 6-8 (Plate XVIII, 7); Hunterian Coll. III, p. 142, Nos. 3-4; Hoover, HSC, 1396
Note:	For coins in the name of “the Brother Peoples”, see note (1) attached to the description of coin MSE-AE-03 above.

Identification Number MSE-AE-07
Authority:	autonomous municipal issue
Mint:	Seleukeia in Pieria
Period:	147/6 BC
Denomination:	AE Double Unit
Weight:	6.58 g
Diameter:	17 - 18 mm
Obverse:	Laureate head of Zeus right; dotted border
Reverse:	‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ’ above, ‘ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ’ below (“of the Seleukeians in Pieria”); winged thunderbolt;2 control marks in upper field and in left lower field; Seleukid date ϚΞΡ (year 166 of the Seleukid Era, i.e. 147/6 BC)3 in lower field; wreath border (only partially visible on lower right edge)
Die Position:	90º
References:	BMC 20, p. 270, Nos. 11-13; Hunterian Coll. III, p. 212, No. 8; Hoover, HSC, 1387
Notes:	(1)	An undated variant of this coin type also exists (see BMC 20, p. 269, Nos. 7-10; Hunterian Coll. III, p. 212, Nos. 6-7; Hoover, HSC, 1386).
	(2)	For concentric circular scratches visible on the obverse, see page Central cavities and concentric scratches.

Identification Number MSE-AE-06
Authority:	municipal issue
Mint:	Seleukeia in Pieria
Period:	c. 146 - 144 BC (?)5
Denomination:	AE Double Unit
Weight:	8.00 g
Diameter:	19.5 - 20.0 mm
Obverse:	Laureate head of Zeus right; dotted border
Reverse:	‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ Τ[Ω]Ν’ above, ‘ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑ[Ι] ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ’ below (“of the Seleukeians in Pieria of the Sacred [city]”); winged thunderbolt;2 two piloi (caps)6 in right upper field; unrecognizable control mark in left upper field; wreath border
Die Position:	90º
References:	Le Rider and Seyrig, Objets de la collection Louis De Clercq, 265; Le Rider, L'atelier de Posideion, 78-79; SNG Cop. 36, 392, and SNG Cop. Suppl., 1202-1203 (the words ‘ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ’ not mentioned in description; No. 1203 bears ‘Τ’ on the right of the piloi)7
Note:	There are three legend variants of this coin type: ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ See coin MSE-AE-07 above and attached references. ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ This coin (see also the list of references above and additional references in footnote 7). ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΟΥ See coin MSE-AE-02 below and attached references and note.

Identification Number MSE-AE-05
Authority:	municipal issue
Mint:	Seleukeia in Pieria
Period:	c. 146 - 144 BC (?)5
Denomination:	AE Double Unit
Weight:	6.28 g
Diameter:	19 - 20 mm
Obverse:	Laureate head of Zeus right; dotted border
Reverse:	‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕ[ΩΝ] ΤΩΝ’ above, ‘ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ’ below (“of the Seleukeians in Pieria of the Sacred [city]”); winged thunderbolt;2 two piloi (caps)6 in right upper field; unrecognizable control mark in left upper field; wreath border
Die Position:	90º
References:	Le Rider and Seyrig, Objets de la collection Louis De Clercq, 265; Le Rider, L'atelier de Posideion, Nos. 78 and 79; SNG Cop. 36, 392, and SNG Cop. Suppl., 1202 and 1203 (the words ‘ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ’ not mentioned in description; No. 1203 bears ‘Τ’ on the right of the piloi)7
Note:	For legend variants, see the note attached to the coin MSE-AE-06 above.

Identification Number MSE-AE-02
Authority:	autonomous municipal issue
Mint:	Seleukeia in Pieria
Period:	97/6 BC (?)
Denomination:	AE Double Unit
Weight:	8.29 g
Diameter:	21 - 22 mm
Obverse:	Laureate head of Zeus right; dotted border
Reverse:	‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ’ above, ‘ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΟ[Υ]’ below (“of the Seleukeians of the Sacred and Autonomous [city]”); winged thunderbolt;2 civic era date ΓΙ (year 13, i.e. 97/6 BC)8 in left upper field; two piloi (caps)6 in right upper field; control mark at the right below the thunderbolt; ‘ΕΟ’ in exergue; laurel wreath border
Die Position:	90º
References:	Butcher, CRS, p. 417, Nos. 35-36 var. (different date); Hunterian Coll. III, p. 213, Nos. 14-15 var. (different years); Hoover, HSC, 1389 var. (different years)
Note:	Butcher, CRS, p. 417, cites only two dates of the civic era for this type of coin: ΜΑ (year 41; the collection of the Studium Biblicum Franciscanum, Jerusalem), and ΕΜ (year 45; E. T. Newell’s collection of the American Numismatic Society). Another specimen dated ΜΑ is in the Hunterian collection (Hunterian Coll. III, p. 213, No. 15). Note that the date of the second Hunterian specimen (ibid, No. 14, Plate LXXIV, 28) is partially off flan but it may be Ε (year 5). It is thus possible that the coin above is in fact dated ΕΟ in exergue, i.e. year 75 (35/4 BC). This year is acceptable because the related autonomous type with the veiled, turreted, and draped bust of Tyche on the obverse is known from 23 years spread over the period from 93/2 BC to 6/5 BC (see Butcher, CRS, pp. 415-417, Nos. 1-34). On the other hand, the dating to the year 13 of the civic era is supported by three known silver denominations dated the same year:
	the tetradrachm: BMC 20, p. 271, Nos. 20-22; the drachm: Leu Numismatik AG (now LHS Numismatik AG), Auction 83 (May 6, 2002), Lot 370; the hemidrachm: Hunterian Coll. III, p. 214, No. 20 (the inscription in an abbreviated form: ‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΑΥΤΟΝΟ[ΜΟΥ]’).
	The design of the reverse of the drachm dated ΓΙ is similar to the reverse of the coin above.

Identification Number MSE-AE-04
Authority:	autonomous municipal issue
Mint:	Seleukeia in Pieria
Period:	79/8 BC (?)
Denomination:	AE Half Unit
Weight:	2.26 g
Diameter:	14 - 14 mm
Obverse:	Laureate head of Apollo right, bow and quiver over shoulder (?); dotted border
Reverse:	‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕ[ΩΝ] ΤΗΣ’ right, ‘[Α]ΥΤΟΝΟΜΟΥ’ left (“of the Seleukeians of the Autonomous [city]”); tripod; ‘Θ’ in inner right field, unclear civic era date in outer left field (perhaps ΑΛ reading downward, i.e. year 31 of the civic era = 79/8 BC);8 laurel wreath border
Die Position:	0º
References:	Butcher, CRS, p. 416, Nos. 16b and 20.2b var. (different years and control marks); Hoover, HSC, 1393 var. (different years, control marks not quoted)
Notes:	(1)	Butcher, CRS, pp. 416-417, records only two variants of this coin type:
		16b: civic era date ΓΛ reading downward (year 33 of the civic era, i.e. 77/6 BC)8 in inner left field and ‘Ε’ in inner right field – SNG Cop. 36, 399 (reading not certain) 20.2b: ‘Μ’ reading downward in inner left field and ‘Δ’ reading downward in inner right field (see Plate 21) which is interpreted as civic era date ΔΜ (year 44 of the civic era, i.e. 66/5 BC)8 – Berlin (Imhoof-Blumer)9
	(2)	The dotted border on the obverse and the laurel wreath border on the reverse are not mentioned in Butcher, CRS, but the dotted border is clearly visible on the plated coin (No. 20.2b, Plate 21; the laurel wreath border on the reverse is off flan on the plated specimen). Hoover, HSC, mentions the laurel wreath border on the reverse but not the dotted border on the obverse (his plated coin is the same as in Butcher, CRS).
	(3)	The legend ‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΑΥΤΟΝΟΜΟΥ’ is also known from three silver denominations:
		drachm: Obv.: Veiled and turreted bust of Tyche r., dotted border. Rev.: winged thunderbolt, ‘Θ’ above and ‘Γ’ beneath, laurel wreath border. BMC 20, p. 271, No. 24. hemidrachm: Obv.: Veiled and turreted bust of Tyche r., dotted border. Rev.: Nike advancing l., holding wreath and palm, date ΓΙ (year 13 of the civic era, i.e. 97/6 BC)8 above inscription, perhaps laurel wreath border. Hunterian Coll. III, p. 214, No. 20 (Plate LXXIV, 30). diobol: Obv.: Head of Zeus. Rev.: thunderbolt. Head, Historia Numorum, p. 783 - Seleuceia Pieria (he refers to Zeitschrift für Numismatik, Vol. III, Berlin, 1876, p. 350).

¹ Tainia was a light fabric ribbon or band tied around the head or body.

² The thunderbolt was a frequent symbol on the coins of Seleukeia in Pieria. The thunderbolt was a cultus-object of Zeus Keraunos (“Zeus of the Thunderbolt”) and, according to Appian, Syriake, 9.58, it was connected with the foundation of the city: They say that when he (Seleukos I) was about to build the two Seleucias (Seleukeia in Pieria and Seleukeia on the Tigris) a portent of thunder preceded the foundation of the one by the sea, for which reason he consecrated thunder as a divinity of the place. Accordingly the inhabitants worship thunder and sing its praises to this day.

³ The Seleukid Era is based on a lunar calendar, beginning with the autumn of 312 BC. It means that if x is a Seleukid year (and x<312) then the corresponding BC time interval is from 313–x to 312–x.

The beginning of the Seleukid Era was set as follows: In 311 BC, shortly after capturing Babylon, Seleukos I Nikator began the enumeration of his satrapal years there. However, after his decisive victory over Antigonos Monophthalmos in 307/6 BC, he backdated his “fictitious” first regnal year to coincide with Nisanu 1, 311 BC (New Year’s Day in the Babylonian calendar). This marked the antedated epoch of the Seleukid calendar according to the Babylonian reckoning. Later in 305/4 BC, when Seleukos I took the diadem and assumed the royal title “King”, he retained the numbering of his regnal years in Babylon but employed the Makedonian calendar and thus pushed his accession year back to Dios, 312 BC (Dios was the first month of the Makedonian calendar; it corresponds to October-November). This became the antedated epoch of the Seleukid era on the Macedonian calendar. (Assar, Recent Studies in Parthian History, Part I, p. 6)

The Seleukid Era was used at least until the first century AD in some Eastern countries.

⁴ It was suggested that the coins were minted by an alliance of the tetrapolis of Seleukeia, Antioch, Apameia and Laodikeia (see Strabo, Geography, 16.2.4, for the close relationships between these cities). However, this hypothesis was disproved by Seyrig, see Bellinger, The End of the Seleucids, p. 60, n. 6, and Cohen, The Hellenistic Settlements in Syria, the Red Sea Basin, and North Africa, p. 133, n. 12.

Strabo, Geography, 16.2.4: Seleucis is the best of the above-mentioned portions of Syria. It is called and is a Tetrapolis, and derives its name from the four distinguished cities which it contains; for there are more than four cities, but the four largest are Antioch Epidaphne (Antioch near Daphne. i.e. Antioch on the Orontes), Seleuceia in Pieria (Seleukeia in Pieria), Apameia (Apameia on the Axios), and Laodiceia (Laodikeia ad Mare). They were called Sisters from the concord which existed between them. They were founded by Seleucus Nicator (Seleukos I). The largest bore the name of his father (Antioch), and the strongest his own (Seleukeia). Of the others, Apameia had its name from his wife Apama, and Laodiceia from his mother (Laodike).

⁵ By Welles, Royal Correspondence in the Hellenistic Period, p. 292, by Cohen, The Hellenistic Settlements in Syria, the Red Sea Basin, and North Africa, p. 127, and by Grainger, The Cities of Seleukid Syria, p. 162, Seleukeia received the title “holy” (ιερα) about c. 146-144 BC, which by 138 BC become “holy and inviolable” (ιερα και ασυλοσ). They slightly differ just in the specification of the period of the granting of the title of “holy” (Welles: about 145 BC, Cohen: by c. 145 BC, Grainger: in the early 140s BC). All these authors refer to a letter from Edward T. Newell, President of the American Numismatic Society, to Welles dated January 19, 1933, which is quoted by Welles in note 3 on p. 292:

“We have coins of Antiochus IV and Alexander I which bear only the inscription: ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ. The latter are dated ΒΞΡ (151/0 B.C.) and ΖΞΡ (147/6 B.C.). Both silver and bronze bear the types: obverse, Head of Zeus to r., reverse, Fulmen in wreath. Now in my collection I possess two bronze coins of these same types and practically the same style and fabric (but undated) and bearing the inscription: ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ. Style and fabric show that these coins could not possibly have been struck more than a year or two after the preceding coins of Alexander I. My guess is that they were struck under Demetrius II at the time of his first reign in Antioch (146-144 B.C.), though it is also possible that they could have been issued in the last year of Alexander I (146). In style they are identical with a series of bronze coins struck by Demetrius II in 146-144 at Antioch. They suggest, to me at least, that the title of ιερα was given to Seleucia either by Alexander or by Demetrius to attach it to their cause, or in recognition of the city’s loyalty during this time.”

“The coin which you found described by Eckhel (J. Eckhel, Doctrina Numorum Veterum, III 1794, 324, no. 2) exists, so far as the short time at my disposal allowed me to ascertain, only in my own collection and at Berlin. You will find a good reproduction of this coin in the Zeitschr. für Numismatik. XXIX (1912), Pl. V, 5. It bears the inscription, ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΣΥΛΟΥ, and is dated ΔΟΡ (138 B.C.). Hence it would seem as if the title ασυλος had been added to that of ιερα somethine between, say, 144 and 138, possibly by Tryphon or by Antiochus VII himself, for political reasons, of course.”

The coin with the title ασυλος described in the second paragraph of Newell’s letter belongs to a quasi-municipal bronze issue struck under Antiochos VII. This issue is now known from two Seleukid years: ΔΟΡ (139/8 BC) and ΕΟΡ (138/7 BC), see Houghton, Lorber and Hoover, SC II, Vol. I, p. 370, types 2074.1 and 2074.2 (denomination A: 25-26 mm, 10.89-16.46 g). According to Houghton, Lorber and Hoover, ibid, Antiochos VII conferred the status of asylia on the city upon his arrival in 138 BC. The grant reflected his gratitude for Seleukeia’s role in his return and accession to power in Syria. Seyrig, Notes on Syrian Coins, p. 21, n. 49, also attributes the grant of the title ασυλος to Antiochos VII (he excluded Tryphon as the potential donator of the title because Seleukeia was constantly loyal to the legitimate Seleukid dynasty). He supposes (ibid, p. 13, n. 21) that this coinage was struck “on the king’s arrival from Side, obviously to congratulate him on his accession, on his marriage to the legitimate queen Cleopatra who was then residing at Seleucia, and on his will to restore legitimacy and lawful order in the realm of his fathers.” Similarly as Newell, Seyrig also supposes that the title “inviolable” was granted to Seleukeia later than the title “holy”. He describes the procedure for acquiring the privilege of asylia and the importance of this title as follows (ibid, pp. 20-21):

“The king, as a sovereign, consecrated the town to one of its principal deities, making it “sacred”, ιερα, and probably thereby renouncing some of his rights in favour of the god, to whom the city now was reputed to belong. The town then sent embassies to the foreign powers, including the great sanctuaries of the ancient world, asking them to recognize it is “inviolable,” ασυλος. As a result, every violation of the town was considered as a sacrilege, and the transgressor was liable to be outlawed. It is difficult for us to see in what measure and fashion such offences were really punished, but the eagerness shown by Hellenistic cities to acquire that form of inviolability certainly testifies that a deep religious fear was attached to such violation, perhaps less by some cynical generals or condottieri, than by their simpler minded troops.”

However, Rigsby, Asylia, p. 486, does not agree with Newell’s and Seyrig’s chronological sequence of the titles “holy” and “inviolable”. He objects that style of the coins with the legend ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ cannot establish such a fine distinction in date, nor is the omission of the title ασυλος sufficient to show that the city possessed less than the full title of inviolability. He notes (ibid, pp. 487-8) that when the city was declared free in 109 BC, “autonomous” supplanted “inviolable” on the coins thereafter, but the inscriptions on stone show that “holy and autonomous” and “autonomous” are abridgments for “holy and inviolable and autonomous” (while only infrequently attested, these titles persist through imperial times with no known interruption). So, the ommision of ασυλος could have been caused by a lack of space on the coins. Note that Le Rider, L’atelier de Posideion et les monnaies de la fouille de Bassit en Syrie, p. 407, also mentions the possibility that the title ασυλος could sometimes have been omitted from the coins. Rigsby even suggests (ibid, p. 486) that some or all bronze coins without the title ασυλος may belong to the period after 139/8 BC (he also mentions in note 34 that the layout of this issue is similar to that of the small silver dating to 97/6 BC).

Rigsby (ibid, p. 488) agrees with Seyrig that the emission of the large and heavy quasi-municipal coins struck under Antiochos VII was a commemorative issue (cf. Seyrig’s note 21 on p. 13 quoted above). He suggests that the city was declared “holy and inviolable” by Antiochos VII in the course of the first year of his reign when he was prevailed upon to grant to his ancestral city an honor equal to that recently granted Tyre by his brother Demetrios II.

I do not agree with Rigsby’s argument that “style cannot establish such a fine distinction in date”. In my opinion, style and fabric of these coins allows a careful conclusion about the minting period. For this reason, I prefer Newell’s dating of the coins with the legend ΣΕΛΕΥΚΕΩΝ ΤΩΝ ΕΜ ΠΙΕΡΙΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΕΡΑΣ.

⁶ Probably the piloi of the Dioskuri. According to Polybios, Histories, 5.60, there was a temple of the Dioskuri at Seleukeia:

Polybios, Histories (the Loeb edition), 5.60.1-5: Antiochus (Antiochos III) first of all sent messages to those in charge of the town (Seleukeia in Pieria), offering them money and promising all kinds of rewards if he were put in possession of the place without fighting. But being unable to persuade the officers in command, he corrupted some of their subordinates, and relying on their assistance he got his forces ready, intending to deliver the attack on the seaward side with the men of his fleet and on the land side with his army. He divided his forces into three parts, and after addressing them in terms suitable to the occasion, and promising both the private soldiers and officers great rewards and crowns for valour, he stationed Zeuxis and his division outside the gate leading to Antioch (Antioch on the Orontes), Hermogenes was posted near the Dioscurium (temple of the Dioskuri), and the task of attacking the port and suburb was entrusted to Ardys and Diognetus, since an agreement had been come to with the king’s partisans within, that if he could take the suburb by storm, the town would be delivered up to him.

Polybios, Histories (the Macmillan edition), 5.60.1-5: Antiochus (Antiochos III) first tried sending messages to the magistrates of Seleucia (Seleukeia in Pieria), offering money and other rewards on condition of having the city surrendered without fighting. And though he failed to persuade the chief authorities, he corrupted some of the subordinate commanders; and relying on them, he made preparations to assault the town on the sea-ward side with the men of his fleet, and on the land side with his soldiers. He divided his forces therefore into three parts, and addressed suitable words of exhortation to them, causing a herald to proclaim a promise to men and officers alike of great gifts and crowns that should be bestowed for gallantry in action. To the division under Zeuxis he entrusted the attack upon the gate leading to Antioch (Antioch on the Orontes); to Hermogenes that upon the walls near the temple of Castor and Pollux (Kastor and Polydeukes, the Dioskuri); and to Ardys and Diognetus the assault upon the docks and the lower town: in accordance with his understanding with his partisans in the town, whereby it had been agreed that, if he could carry the lower town by assault, the city also should then be put into his hands.

⁷ My sincere thanks to Panagiotis Iossif for information about the specimens in SNG Copenhagen. Cohen, The Hellenistic Settlements in Syria, the Red Sea Basin, and North Africa, p. 131, n. 9, lists also the following references:

Waage, Dorothy B.: Antioch-on-the-Orontes, IV, part 2, Greek, Roman, Byzantine and Crusaders’ coins. Princeton University Press, 1952. – No. 726

Lindgren, Henry Clay; Kovacs, Frank L.: Ancient bronze coins of Asia Minor and the Levant from the Lindgren collection. Chrysopylon Publications, San Francisco, 1985. – No. 2121

⁸ The civic era is counted from the year 204 of the Seleukid Era, i.e. from 109/108 BC. This means that if x is a year of the civic era then the corresponding BC time interval is from 110–x to 109–x.

Seleukeia was granted its autonomy by Antiochos VIII (or, less probably, by Antiochos IX) in September 109 BC (the end of the year 203 of the Seleukid Era); see Welles, Royal Correspondence in the Hellenistic Period, pp. 288-294 (a detailed analysis of a letter of a King Antiochos to King Ptolemy X Alexander announcing the granting of the autonomy), and Bellinger, The End of the Seleucids, p. 69. However, Seleukeia reckoned the era from the Seleukid year 204 (109/8 BC), see Rigsby, Asylia, p. 486, paragraph D. Thus Antiochos VIII was not in Seleukeia that time and his decision took a month or more to reach the city (ibid, n. 35 on p. 486). Note that the autonomous status was recognized by Pompey the Great when he established the province of Syria in 64 BC (Strabo, Geography, 16.2.8).

Welles, Royal Correspondence in the Hellenistic Period, pp. 289-290, Letter 71: King Antiochus (probably Antiochos VIII) to king Ptolemy (Ptolemy X Alexander I Philometor), also called Alexander, his brother, greeting. If you were well it would be as we wish; we ourselves were well and were remembering you with love. The people of Seleucia in Pieria, the city holy and inviolable, [from of old] supported our father and throughout maintained steadfast their good-will toward him. They have been constant in their love toward us and have shown it [through many] fine deeds especially in the most desperate times we have experienced. We have therefore hitherto furthered their interests generously as they deserve and have brought them into [more conspicuous] honor. Now, being anxious to reward them fittingly with the first [and greatest] benefaction, [we have decided that they be] for all time free, [and we have entered them in the treaties] which we have mutually concluded, [thinking] that thus [our piety and generosity] toward our ancestral city will be more apparent. [So that you also may] know [these concessions, it seemed] best [to write you]. Farewell. Year 203, Gorpiaeus 29 (September 109 BC). (Note: Ptolemy X is numbered as Ptolemy IX by Welles. For the numbering see Bennett, Egyptian Royal Genealogy: Ptolemy X.)

Strabo, Geography, 16.2.8: Seleuceia formerly had the name of Hydatopotami (rivers of water). It is a considerable fortress, and may defy all attacks; wherefore Pompey, having excluded from it Tigranes (Tigranes II the Great) declared it a free city.

⁹ Das Münzkabinett der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin (State Museum Berlin Coin Cabinet), formerly in the Dr. F. Imhoof-Blumer Collection.

References:

Appian: Roman History, Book XI - The Syrian Wars. Translated by Horace White. Macmillan and Co., New York, 1899. (The Perseus Digital Library, http://www.perseus.org/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=App.+Syr.+1.1; Livius.org, http://www.livius.org/ap-ark/appian/appian_syriaca_00.html)

Assar, Gholamreza F.: Recent Studies in Parthian History, Part I. The Celator, Vol. 14, No. 12 (December 2000), pp. 6-22.

Bellinger, Alfred R.: The End of the Seleucids. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 38, June 1949, pp. 51 – 102. New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Bennett, Christopher J.: Egyptian Royal Genealogy. Website, http://www.tyndalehouse.com/Egypt/

Butcher, Kevin: Coinage in Roman Syria: Northern Syria, 64 BC - AD 253. Royal Numismatic Society Special Publication No. 34, London, 2004. (abbr. CRS)

Cohen, Getzel M.: The Hellenistic Settlements in Syria, the Red Sea Basin, and North Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles / California - London / England, 2006.

Grainger, John D.: The Cities of Seleukid Syria. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2004 (reprint of the 1990 original edition).

Head, Barclay V.: Historia Numorum. A Manual of Greek Numismatics. Oxford, 1911, 2nd ed. (Ed Snible and coworkers: Digital Historia Numorum, http://www.snible.org/coins/hn)

Hoover, Oliver D.: The Handbook of Syrian Coins: Royal and Civic Issues, Fourth to First Centuries BC. The Handbook of Greek Coinage Series, Vol. 9. Classical Numismatic Group, Inc., Lancaster / Pennsylvania - London / England, 2009. (abbr. HSC)

Houghton, Arthur; Lorber, Catharine; Hoover, Oliver: Seleucid Coins, A Comprehensive Catalogue. Part II, Volumes 1 and 2. The American Numismatic Society, New York, in association with Classical Numismatic Group, Inc., Lancaster/London, 2008. (abbr. SC II)

Le Rider, Georges: L’atelier de Posideion et les monnaies de la fouille de Bassit en Syrie. Bulletin de correspondance hellénique 110 (1986), pp. 393-408. (url: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/bch_0007-4217_1986_num_110_1_1805)

Le Rider, Georges; Seyrig, Henri: Objets de la collection Louis De Clercq donnés en 1967 au Cabinet des Médailles de la Bibliothèque nationale par le comte et la comtesse Henri de Boisgelin. Revue Numismatique, 6th Series - Vol. 10 (1968), pp. 7-50. (url: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/numi_0484-8942_1968_num_6_10_958)

MacDonald, George: Catalogue of Greek Coins in the Hunterian Collection, University of Glasgow. Volume 3. Further Asia, Northern Africa, Western Europe. Elibron Classics, Adamant Media Corporation, 2003. Replica edition of the edition published by James Maclehose and Sons, Glasgow, 1905. (abbr. Hunterian Coll. III)

Polybios: Histories. Translated by W. R. Paton, The Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge / Massachusetts - London / England, 1922 - 1927. (William P. Thayer’s Web Site, http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius)

Polybios: Histories. Translated by Evelyn S. Shuckburgh. Macmillan and Co., London - New York, 1889. (The Perseus Digital Library, http://www.perseus.org/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=Plb.+toc)

Rigsby, Kent J.: Asylia. Territorial Inviolability in the Hellenistic World. University of California Press, Berkeley - Los Angeles - London, 1996.

Seyrig, Henri: Notes on Syrian Coins. Numismatic Notes and Monographs No. 119, The American Numismatic Society, New York, 1950.

Sylloge Numorum Graecorum Copenhagen: The Royal Collection of Coins and Medals, Danish National Museum – Vol. 36, Syria: Cities. Copenhagen, 1959. (abbr. SNG Cop. 36)

Sylloge Numorum Graecorum Copenhagen: The Royal Collection of Coins and Medals, Danish National Museum – Supplement, Acquisitions 1942-1996. Copenhagen, 2002. (abbr. SNG Cop. Suppl.)

Strabo: Geography. Translated and ed. by H. C. Hamilton and W. Falconer. Henry G. Bohn, London, 1854 - 1857.

Strabo: Geography. Translated and ed. by H. C. Hamilton and W. Falconer. William Heinemann, Ltd., London, 1924. (The Perseus Digital Library, http://www.perseus.org/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=Strab.+toc)

Welles, Bradford C.: Royal Correspondence in the Hellenistic Period: A Study in Greek Epigraphy. Ares Publishers Inc., Chicago, 1974. Unchanged reprint of the edition published by Yale University Press, New Haven, 1934.

Wroth, Warwick: British Museum Catalog of Greek Coins, Volume 20: Greek Coins of Galatia, Cappadocia and Syria. London, 1899 (reprint, Arnaldo Forni, Bologna, 1964). (abbr. BMC 20)