Seleukid Coins
Seleukos II
Silver coin • Bronze coin • References

| Identification Number SE2-AR-01 | |
| Mint: | Antioch on the Orontes1 |
| Period: | c. 244 - 226 BC |
| Denomination: | AR Tetradrachm |
| Weight: | 17.08 g |
| Diameter: | 28 - 29 mm |
| Obverse: | Diademed head of Seleukos II right; dotted border |
| Reverse: | ‘ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ’ on right, ‘ΣΕΛΕΥΚΟΥ’ on left (“of King Seleukos”); Apollo standing left, testing arrow and resting left elbow on tall tripod; control marks in inner left and outer right fields |
| Die Position: | 0º |
| References: | Houghton and Lorber, SC I, 689.1a; Le Rider, Antioche, p. 62, No. 18, Plate 6.17 (dies A2/P9); Newell, WSM, 991 |

| Identification Number SE2-AE-01 | ||
| Mint: | ΔΕΛ mint associated with Antioch mint2 | |
| Period: | 246 - 226 BC | |
| Denomination: | AE Unit | |
| Weight: | 3.26 g | |
| Diameter: | 15 - 16 mm | |
| Obverse: | Diademed head of Seleukos II right; dotted border | |
| Reverse: | ‘[Β]ΑΣΙΛΕ[ΩΣ]’ above, ‘[Σ]ΕΛΕΥ[ΚΟΥ]’ below (“of King Seleukos”); horse trotting left, two stars above and ‘ΔΕΛ’ monogram3 under belly | |
| Die Position: | 0º | |
| References: | Houghton and Lorber, SC I, 710a; Newell, WSM, 1163; SNG Spaer, 434-435; BMC 4, p. 17, No. 16 (Plate VI, 5); Hunterian Coll. III, p. 25, No. 12 | |
1 Antioch was founded about 300 BC by Seleukos I Nikator, the founder of the Seleukid Dynasty, and it became the principal capital of the Seleukid Empire. The city was named after a family name Antiochos, passed from his father to his son (Antiochos I Soter). There were a number of other cities by the same name and this Antioch was known as Antioch on the Orontes (i.e. the Orontes River, along which it was located).
2 The ΔΕΛ mint was opened in the period between the death of Antiochos II in 246 BC and the arrival of Seleukos II in Syria in c. 244 BC (the period of occupation of Northern Syria by Ptolemy III). It continued in operation through the reign of Seleukos II, was inactive under Seleukos III, and experienced a final short-lived revival under Antiochos III. All indications point to a close association of this mint with Antioch: perhaps it was a separate workshop within the mint, or a branch mint in a different quarter of the city, or in a suburb such as Daphne. For details, see Houghton and Lorber, SC I, Volume I, pp. 227, 258 and 403.
3